In glancing at
European history, age is seldom discussed. In feudal society through the years
of early capitalism, people rarely saw what we would consider old age today.
Between the 1540’s and 1800 the life expectancy in England was thirty-five
years of age (Thane, 2003). This figure is not an entirely accurate portrayal of the realities
of the time, as there were a number of infant deaths that dragged the life
expectancy well below average (Thane, 2003). For those ‘fortunate’ enough to
see long lives, there were significant challenges. Age has always, and
continues to bare consequence on an individual’s place in society.
The gender of an
individual was a defining point in their status as they approached late life.
Social status relied heavily on land ownership (Seccombe, 1992). A woman rarely owned land,
unless it was a gained through dower rights following the death of her husband
(Seccombe, 1992). Many men had wills and retirement contracts written up
through the church. These documents outlined the division of labour expected of
their sons in the care of their widowed mother. If the mother remarried or
passed away, the sons would take ownership of the land if they had met
expectations set by their fathers (Seccombe, 1992). Even if a woman came to
possess land, she could be forced to remarry later in life. It was expected
that widowed women remain pure (free of sexual relations) until she was
remarried. Women would often be chastised for failing to do so (Seccombe, 1992).
In England, the
aged were cared for, to an extent, by English poor laws (Thane, 2003). From
1597-1948, the aged and the poor were protected by the state through poor laws
comprised of public taxation. Many elderly people were provided for through the
state, and many others through the charity of the church. The church provided
money, clothing, food, medical aide, and some degree of assistance (Thane,
2003). It is important to note however, that until fairly recently, there was
no golden age in which care was offered to the elderly (Thane, 2003). Only the
ill and the destitute were ‘cared for’. Despite age, if an individual was
perceived as ‘fit to work’ they could be rejected from any of the services
available and they would be left to fend for themselves.
Many people
approaching old age, along with the widowed and the disabled, found themselves
in workhouses (Thane, 2003). A number of others would do light jobs in the community.
There were many jobs primarily performed by the elderly in early modern Europe.
Older men would be seen mending roads, grounds keeping, or attending to minor
jobs on a farm. Women would often offer care-giving and domestic services
(Thane, 2003). Many people worked well into age, as it was expected that they
do so until they could no longer.
Aging in early
modern Europe presented a number of challenges. The wealthy were typically
cared for to a greater extent as they aged. The poor, on the other hand, had
little access to assistance and were primarily left to fend for themselves, working
well into old age. Age seemed to bare little consequence on the place of an
individual in society; if anything, it made life significantly more difficult.
-Kayla
References
Seccombe, Wally. (1992). A millennium of family change: feudalism to capitalism in northwestern Europe. Verso. London, England.
Thane, P. (2003). Social histories of old age and aging. Journal of Social History, 37 (1), 93-111. DOI: 10.1353/jsh.2003.0163. Retrieved from: http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/journal_of_social_history/v037/37.1thane.html
I liked how you tied your post with what we have been learning in class (speaking for myself I know it was difficult for my subject to be relatable). Out history is one of many interesting stories on how we treated each other. Being a huge history buff, it still surprises me how awful we were to each other, just for the profit of ourselves. I wonder, where do you stand on the treatment of elders during that period? Do you think they deserved help?
ReplyDelete-Amy
Thank you for your comments Amy.
DeleteI definitely feel that older adults could have used the help at that time as much as any. Even if there was a focus on the labour force; there should be and should have been more supports in place for those that could no longer 'contribute' due to age. I was amazed at how little attention was paid to the challenges of aging. It's as if age bore no consequence on an individual's ability to produce. It saddens me that one's production was, and continues to be, the measure of success. It's still apparent today. I have relatives who have recently retired. They spent years waiting for retirement and now that it's here, they are struggling to make the most of it. This is partially due to a drop in their income. It is also due to this culturally conditioned idea that we must produce in order to be considered a valuable member of society; as if labour defines us.
-Kayla T.